Students play solitaire instead of paying attention; Professors retaliate by banning laptops in class; students pass around a petition and file a complaint with the ABA; the law school dean supports the professors; student threaten to drop out if they can't use their laptops. Who will win this? I support the professors on this.
From LawCrossing :
Last year, at the University of Michigan, when law professor Don Herzog asked his students a question, there was a five-second pause followed by blank stares. Knowing that something was amiss, Herzog decided to investigate the matter on his own.
Sitting in on his colleagues' classes, the professor was astounded by what he discovered. "At any given moment in a law school class, literally 85 to 90 percent of the students were online, Herzog said. "And what were they doing online? They were reading the New York Times; they were shopping for clothes at Eddie Bauer; they were looking for an apartment to rent in San Francisco when their new job started…and I was stunned," reported Herzog. .... As students and professors are at a technological standoff, the students are whipping out their digital weapons, while professors confidently encourage them: Go ahead, make my day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
From the Florida Bar News, July 1, 2006:
Dutifully following a playful, but pointed, federal court order, Tampa lawyers David Pettinato, of the Merlin Law Group, and D. Lee Craig, of Butler Pappas, will meet June 20 and engage in one game of “rock, paper, scissors” to solve a dispute in the midst of heated litigation.
“We will do it quickly, humbly, and go on about our business,” said a contrite Pettinato, who is amazed about “getting bombarded from news media from all over the country.” CNN, ABC, The Wall Street Journal, and The New York Times, to name a few.
Make that international news, as London’s The Guardian also did its version of the everybody’s-talking-about-it June 6 order issued by U.S. Middle District Judge Gregory Presnell, who was a member of The Florida Bar Board of Governors from 1989-93.
At issue was the childlike squabbling between the attorneys in Avista Management, Inc., vs. Wausau Underwriters Insurance Co. (case no. 6:05-cv-1430-Orl-31JGG), in litigation over an insurance settlement stemming from 2004’s Hurricane Charley.
Even though the sparring lawyers’ offices are only four floors apart in the same building at 777 S. Harbor Island Blvd. in Tampa, they could not agree on where to hold a deposition. Craig, representing Wausau, wanted to question a witness in his office. Pettinato, representing Avista, was not willing to let Craig have the home-court advantage, and insisted on a neutral setting of a court reporter’s office down the street.
When they took the matter to the court, Presnell let them have it, fed up with “the latest series of Gordian knots that the parties have been unable to untangle without enlisting the assistance of the federal courts.”
In what the judge called “a new form of alternative dispute resolution,” Presnell ordered that each attorney will be “accompanied by one paralegal who shall act as an attendant and witness,” and “the winner of this engagement shall be entitled to select the location for the 30(b)(6) deposition to be held somewhere in Hillsborough County during the period July 11-12, 2006. If either party disputes the outcome of this engagement, an appeal may be filed and a hearing will be held at 8:30 a.m. on Friday, July 7, before the undersigned in Courtroom 3.” That creative order compelled St. Petersburg Times columnist Sue Carlton to nominate Presnell for “Jurist of the Year.”
No Need for an Appeal On June 8, Pettinato said that he and Craig have resolved the issue. Pettinato said both sides agreed to play rock, paper, scissors, at “an undisclosed location.” Whoever wins will get to hold the deposition in his office.
“We want to do it out of respect for the judge’s order,” said Pettinato, who added, “I have to say I am a little disappointed that we couldn’t resolve our differences without this court order. But it provided us with an eye-opener to resolve our differences in a more amicable way. Since the hurricanes, we have been having huge battles trying to get insurance companies to pay. . . .If you get a little too passionate advocating for your client, it helps to rethink your strategy.”
The matter has been zinging across the state, around the country, and across the ocean, on news Web sites, lawyers’ e-mails, and law blogs.
Orlando lawyer Lynn James Hinson, who called Presnell an excellent lawyer and judge, posted this comment on The Wall Street Journal’s Law Blog: “Many lawyers act like they are in kindergarten, and this order treats them appropriately.”
Craig, who did not return the News’ request for an interview, may be at a disadvantage. Pettinato has a kindergartner in the house, as the father of a 5-year-old and 9-year-old. “I play it all the time with them. I can’t say I’m an expert, but I know the rules,” Pettinato said. “Now, my 5-year-old keeps throwing her hand out, saying, ‘Dad, let’s practice.’”
Pettinato said his kids have advised him to open with rock, which he thought was apropos “because my case is solid as a rock.”
But Matti Leshem, co-commissioner of the USA Rock Paper Scissors League, told The New York Times, “I guarantee you right now that both lawyers will open with paper. Lawyers open with paper 67 percent of the time, because they deal with so much paper.”
Leshem agreed to officiate, saying, “What I don’t want is some rogue element of rock-paper-scissors coming down from the bench. When the law takes rock-paper-scissors into its own hands, mayhem can occur.”
While Pettinato said he has greatest respect for the judge and “got the message,” he is willing to laugh at himself, “or else I’ll grow despondent.”
Taking it somewhat seriously is the World Rock Paper Scissors Society. “This is a landmark case of how RPS should be used to keep the wheels of justice moving forward when dealing with lawyer engaging in posturing tactics,” Doug Walker, managing director of the World RPS Society, told the News.
“Although we take issue with RPS being labeled as a ‘new’ form of dispute resolution, we understand it is not commonly used in courtrooms and applaud Judge Presnell’s wisdom in the matter.”
Noting that Rock, Paper, Scissors dates back to at least the 18th century in Japan, it was used to settle an auction-house dispute in April when “an $18 million art portfolio was acquired by Christie’s due to a cleverly executed throw of paper,” over Sotheby’s rock.
The World Rock Paper Scissors Society, Walker said, plans to invite Judge Presnell to attend the International Rock Paper Scissors Championships in Toronto on September 30, as “chief consultant to Head Referee Brad Fox.” No word yet on whether the judge will accept the invitation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| I'm going to the Family Law Seminar at St. Simon's Island, Georgia, Feb. 16-18. It will be at the beautiful King and Prince Beach & Golf Resort. My old Remedies professor, Steven Combs will be giving a session on Discovery and Procedure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| It's a little short notice, but I am going to hear Judge Gooding speak Feb. 10 at noon at the CLS luncheon at The University Club in Jacksonville. The topic is foster children and parents and adoption.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Former US Senator and Vice-Presidential Candidate John Edwards will speak on April 3 at the Law Day Luncheon at the Hyatt Regency in Jacksonville. For more information see www.jaxbar.org.
|
|
|
|
|
|
From: http://www.unf.edu/development/news/mediarelations/lectures/
ERIN BROCKOVICH Monday, February 27, 2006 7:30 p.m. in the UNF Arena AN EVENING WITH ERIN BROCKOVICH
Erin Brockovich launched her career as an environmental activist in 1991, when she started working for the law firm of Masry and Vititoe as a file clerk, stumbling upon some medical records on a pro bono real estate case that piqued her curiosity.
Brockovich established that the health of countless people who lived in and around Hinkley, California, in the 1960s, ‘70s and ‘80s had been devastated by exposure to toxic Chromium 6, which had leaked into the groundwater from the nearby Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s Compressor Station.
In 1996, as a result of the largest direct action lawsuit of its kind, spearheaded by Brockovich and Ed Masry, the giant utility was ordered to make the biggest legal settlement in U.S. history, paying out some $333 million in damages to more than 600 Hinkley residents.
The story of Brockovich’s investigation and legal triumph were dramatized in the hit movie “Erin Brockovich,” released in March 2000, starring Julia Roberts. Today she is the director of environmental research at Masry and Vititoe and is currently involved in other major environmental lawsuits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is Hilarious!!! Read the whole thing. This is an actual letter sent to a man named Ryan DeVries by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, State of Michigan. This guy's response is hilarious, but read the State's letter before you get to the response letter.
SUBJECT: DEQ File No.97-59-0023; T11N; R10W, Sec. 20; Montcalm County
Dear Mr. DeVries:
It has come to the attention of the Department of Environmental Quality that there has been recent unauthorized activity on the above referenced parcel of property. You have been certified as the legal landowner and/or contractor who did the following unauthorized activity:
Construction and maintenance of two wood debris dams across the outlet stream of Spring Pond.
A permit must be issued prior to the start of this type of activity. A review of the department's files shows that no permits have been issued. Therefore, the Department has determined that this activity is in violation of Part 301, Inland Lakes and Streams, of the Natural Resource and Environmental Protection Act, Act 451 of the Public Acts of 1994, being sections 324.30101 to 324.30113 of the Michigan Compiled Laws, annotated.
The Department has been informed that one or both of the dams partially failed during a recent rain event, causing debris and flooding at downstream locations. We find that dams of this nature are inherently hazardous and cannot be permitted. The Department therefore orders you to cease and desist all activities at this location, and to restore the stream to a free-flow condition by removing all wood and brush forming the dams from the stream channel. All restoration work shall be completed no later than January 31, 2005.
Please notify this office when the restoration has been completed so that a follow-up site inspection may be scheduled by our staff. Failure to comply with this request or any further unauthorized activity on the site may result in this case being referred for elevated enforcement action. We anticipate and would appreciate your full cooperation in this matter. Please feel free to contact me at this office if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
David L. Price, District Representative Land and Water Management Division
** Here is the actual response sent back by Mr. DeVries: ** Re: DEQ File No. 97-59-0023; T11N; R10W, Sec. 20; Montcalm County.
Dear Mr. Price,
Your certified letter dated 12/17/02 has been handed to me to respond to. I am the legal landowner but not the Contractor at 2088 Dagget, Pierson, Michigan. A couple of beavers are in the process of constructing and maintaining two wood "debris" dams across the outlet stream of my Spring Pond.
While I did not pay for, authorize, nor supervise their dam project, I think they would be highly offended that you call their skillful use of natures building materials "debris." I would like to challenge your department to attempt to emulate their dam project any time and/or any place you choose.
I believe I can safely state there is no way you could ever match their dam skills, their dam resourcefulness, their dam ingenuity, their dam persistence, their dam determination and/or their dam work ethic.
As to your request, I do not think the beavers are aware that they must first fill out a dam permit prior to the start of this type of dam activity.
My first dam question to you is: (1) Are you trying to discriminate against my Spring Pond Beavers, or (2) do you require all beavers throughout this state to conform to said dam request? If you are not discriminating against these particular beavers, through the Freedom of Information Act, I request completed copies of all those other applicable beaver dam permits that have been issued. Perhaps we will see if there really is a dam violation of Part 301, Inland Lakes and Streams, of the Natural Resource and Environmental Protection Act, Act 451 of the Public Acts of 1994, being sections 324.30101to 324.30113 of the Michigan Compiled Laws, annotated.
I have several concerns. My first concern is; aren't the beavers entitled to legal representation? The Spring Pond Beavers are financially destitute and are unable to pay for said representation -- so the State will have to provide them with a dam lawyer. The Department's dam concern that either one or both of the dams failed during a recent rain event, causing flooding, is proof that this is a natural occurrence, which the Department is required to protect. In other words, we should leave the Spring Pond Beavers alone rather than harassing them and calling their dam names.
If you want the stream "restored" to a dam free-flow condition please contact the beavers -- but if you are going to arrest them, they obviously did not pay any attention to your dam letter, they being unable to read English.
In my humble opinion, the Spring Pond Beavers have a right to build their unauthorized dams as long as the sky is blue, the grass is green and water flows downstream. They have more dam rights than I do to live and enjoy Spring Pond. If the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection lives up to its name, it should protect the natural resources(Beavers) and the environment (Beavers' Dams).
So, as far as the beavers and I are concerned, this dam case can be referred for more elevated enforcement action right now. Why wait until 1/31/2005? The Spring Pond Beavers may be under the dam ice then and there will be no way for you or your dam staff to contact/harass them then.
In conclusion, I would like to bring to your attention to a real environmental quality (health) problem in the area. It is the bears! Bears are actually defecating in our woods. I definitely believe you should be persecuting the defecating bears and leave the beavers alone. If you are going to investigate the beaver dam, watch your step! (The bears are not careful where they dump!) Being unable to comply with your dam request, and being unable to contact you on your dam answering machine, I am sending this response to your dam office.
THANK YOU.
RYAN DEVRIES & THE DAM BEAVERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is an interesting NY Times article about QPRTs:
- "A Trust With Pros and Cons
With homes appreciating in value, many older people may have to worry about their heirs facing estate taxes. The solution could be transferring the home to their children via a Qualified Personal Residence Trust. Following are a few pros and cons:
Pros ¶It removes the appreciated value of a house from a parent's estate for significant estate tax savings. ¶Parent continues to live in the house during the term of the trust. ¶Residences and vacation homes qualify, and a person can protect two homes, sometimes a third. ¶Paying rent to children is yet another way to transfer wealth to them.
Cons ¶The cost basis of the house remains the same as it was for the parents, which means higher capital gains tax when it is sold. ¶If the parent dies before the term of the trust ends, the children inherit the house at its current value. ¶Children become their parents' landlord when the trust expires, and children could evict the parents or raise the rent. ¶Setting up such a trust is complicated; you'll need a lawyer."
Also, see this story: With a Little Estate Planning, Your House Can Stay in the Family
|
|
|
|
|
|
According to the Chicago Sun-Times, Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois said that there may be enough votes to sustain a filibuster against Judge Samuel Alito.
- "It's a matter of counting. We have 45 Democrats, counting [Vermont independent] Jim Jeffords, on our side. We could sustain a filibuster if 41 senators ... are willing to stand and fight."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|